Month: September 2024

Posted on

Laura Gordon Paints A “Ring Round The Moon” At American Players Theatre

Set for Ring Round The Moon. Photo courtesy of the American Players Theatre. Photographer Liz Lauren.

I don’t know exactly where to start here, it’s a tough play to write about. If I am lucky, this will write itself!

Let’s try this, from the director’s notes to the play from the incomparable Laura Gordon: “Ring Round the Moon is a play that I find difficult to classify. It’s a comedy. It’s a romance. It contains farcical elements, yet it’s not a farce.” I will quibble with this last bit…although a few definitions require horseplay for a farce (and I will maintain that there is a bit here), most don’t, like this one from Merriam-Webster: a light dramatic composition marked by broadly satirical comedy and improbable plot. So my first review statement, we have ourselves a farce here of grand proportions and I loved every moment of it, in no small part as the result of Gordon’s direction!!!

And I have no idea how Gordon managed to put this on stage. It contains 12 major characters with speaking roles, dozens of entries and exits, as she mentioned any number of characters taking on an alias or two, any number of costume changes, relationship changes, falsehoods and exposures, and one hard put upon actor who had to play twin brothers! I saw it! I admired it! I laughed out loud! Heartily. But even now I am having a hard time remembering every morsel of the action. Yet, it moved and swirled with seemingly no effort…well except our hard put upon actor! Brava!!!

Nate Burger and David Daniel. Photo courtesy of American Players Theatre. Photographer: Liz Lauren.

Now, on to the twins! Twin brothers, Hugo and Frederic are of course somewhat competitive with one another in a typical sibling competitive way. And physically, they are identical twins and quite handsome, in a Nate Burger sort of way if you catch my drift. But their personalities are vastly different, Hugo being brash and direct and a bit diabolical, while Frederic is more reserved, maybe a bit introverted, and certainly a respectful young man. They are rich…well as many of the characters here are. And Nate Burger plays both men…very very well. But with their different mannerisms and vocal inflections, I have no idea how he keeps them straight, evokes the correct personality and vocal inflections, or for that matter, how he remembers all of his lines. But he does have a body double of sorts…one Nick Farasey who plays one twin or the other when they need to be seen off in the distance or somewhere about in the next room. But for us the audience, it’s look out, Burger just entered stage left, who is it to be, Hugo or Frederic??

One of the other standouts (no I am not belittling anyone here) is Barbara Kingsley, as Madame Desmortes, the aunt of two intrepid twins. Despite being confined to a wheelchair, she isn’t above partaking in a bit of hi-jinks and subterfuge by manipulating the various guests and principals for her own amusement and a result where all ends well!

Phoebe Gonzalez. Photo courtesy of American Players Theatre. Photographer: Liz Lauren.

Others who amused above and beyond, Laura Rook as Diana Messerman who is in love with Hugo, I can’t imagine why, but is engaged to Frederic who is marriageable as her plan B. And Phoebe Gonzalez is amazing as ballet dancer Isabelle. Gonzalez easily and believably morphs from a giddy dancer for hire to becoming a bit resistant as Hugo’s pawn, to finally despair as too many things go awry?? Or they just become too fluid to manage?

But the farce here isn’t restricted to the aristocrats on view or the impersonators they bring to the fore, but to the servants. David Daniel takes a hilarious turn as, in the cast list, a crumbling butler, and Elizabeth Reese has mastered the dramatic eye roll as Capulet, Madame Desmortes, ‘faded’ companion!

Colleen Madden and Phoebe Gonzalez. Photo courtesy of American Players Theatre. Photographer: Liz Lauren.

Ring Round The Moon was adapted by Christopher Fry in 1950 from Jean Anouilh’s Invitation to the Castle from 1947 (which is described in the literature as a satirical play). But I still hold that in Fry’s hands it is a farce!!

Again, sorry that I am so late into the season, there are only two dates left. But info and tickets can be found here!! Play is just over three hours including two 15 minute intermissions.

Barbara Kingsley. Photo courtesy of American Players Theatre. Photographer: Liz Lauren.
Posted on

Racing Across The Prairie To Go “Dancing At Lughnasa” @APT

left to right, Maggie Cramer as Chris, Colleen Madden as Maggie, Laura Rook as Agnes, Tracy Michelle Arnold as Kate, Elizabeth Reese as Rose. Photo courtesy of American Players Theatre. Photos by Liz Lauren. 

Certainly the American Players Theatre has done this before, but not in my memory. But for Dancing At Lughnasa, the back wall of their venerable main stage in The Hill Theater was open so we could view the bit of prairie in the background. And I wondered why until the play started and a number of the Mundy sisters came running and skipping across the prairie to their shared home at mid-set. And this grand entrance sets the scene for ‘girlish’ frolics and fun, even though our sisters are now young adults. Well all but the eldest sister Kate, who is a school teacher and something of the head of household here…and determined to maintain a home and social standing of decorum and etiquette proper to adult women in rural Ireland.

The Mundy’s live in a small cottage just outside of the fictional village of Ballybeg in County Donegal. There are five sisters in all. Kate, the eldest, is a school teacher. Maggie, the uninhibited soul of the clan, is also the one who has taken on the drudgery of keeping the house. Agnes and Rose earn a bit of cash by participating in the local cottage industry of knitting mittens. And Chris is the youngest, and the mother of seven year old Michael Evans. They are also caring for their older bother, Father Jack who has just returned from a 25 year sojourn as a missionary in an African leper colony. He is home to recover from malaria but there seems to be something more as well. This is both a blessing and a curse.

Photo courtesy of American Players Theatre. Photos by Liz Lauren. 

Director Brenda DeVita writes in her notes in the program, “…I have to confess a tiny bit of pride, a satisfaction rests on my chest. I have a lump in my throat. I love my people. They are the people of this play.” Well, she has also put a lump in my throat and they are my people as well. And there should be more than a tiny bit of pride involved…she has assembled an amazing cast from APT’s 2024 ensemble and she has clearly brought them together on stage with a genuine feeling of joy, angst, and love leaving little doubt that this is an actual family that we are seeing here.

Kate. Photo courtesy of American Players Theatre. Photos by Liz Lauren. 

Tracy Michelle Arnold brings us a believable Kate, a school teacher and the eldest sister. She functions as a matriarch of sorts given her role in the community as a school teacher and principal wage earner in the family. Arnold brings to life a bit of her stern nature and sense of Christian devotion but at times easily melts to a softness around her family and particularly Father Jack…well until! And Arnold also clearly depicts Kate’s disquiet around her treatment by the local priest and later her ‘release’ from her teaching duties.

Rose is a bit of a question mark…the most girlish of the sisters in a youthful way…because of apparent developmental issues. Elizabeth Reese portrays her here with all of the ease and joy of the childlike but as quickly shifts to a disquieting and tragic mood when Rose has apparently been taken advantage of my a local man.

Laura Rook’s Agnes is often hard to read at times but Rook provides us with an industrious knitter and yet still a soul that rocks with the family. And she apparently has a bit of a secret interest in the elusive Gerry Evans.

Chris is the youngest but has an older edge because she is raising her son, Michael Evans, her out of wedlock ‘love child’. She helps around the house and watches over Michael, but is still easily distracted by the attentions of Gerry Evans, Michael’s father. Maggie Cramer exudes an incredible energy and joy in life when Gerry is around the house…and as easily becomes moody when he fails to fulfill his promises…because we later learn that he can’t.

And Maggie, dear, sweet, Maggie. Colleen Madden is most often the keystone to any cast that she is in, as she is here. But, she was born to play Maggie Mundy. Madden gives us a Maggie in touch with her soul and is easily expressive of her spirit while quietly, well not always, accepting her role in the household. While working to outdo or overplay her sisters during their intervals of merriment, Madden’s Maggie is also ready to make her point about their reliance on her labors. Even when she wasn’t speaking I couldn’t ignore Madden’s movements about the stage.

James Ridge as Father Jack. Photo courtesy of American Players Theatre. Photos by Liz Lauren. 

And the ‘man’ about the house is Father Jack, returned from Africa to recover from malaria but also surrounded by a bit of mystery. A local hero particularly in the eyes of Kate, if you ignore his time spent as a chaplain in the British Army during World War I, Jack has served as a missionary in a leper colony in Africa. James Ridge is a superb Father Jack, providing the shuffling body of a very ill individual and a man seemingly older than his years. And Ridge presents just the right moments of hesitation as he forces himself to remember his sisters’ names and other common English vocabulary words that he’s forgotten while overseas speaking primarily Swahili. But as his physical control returns and his memory improves, we find the reason for the reticence of the local priest to engage with the Mundy’s. Father Jack has gone native and Ridge excitedly and vigorously acts out and vividly describes the various native ceremonies that he’s committed to memory and explains how ‘we’ used them in Africa.

Maggie Cramer as Chris and Nate Burger as Gerry. Photo courtesy of American Players Theatre. Photos by Liz Lauren. 

And Gerry? I am not sure exactly how to describe him but he is a cad and a romantic one at that. Nate Burger’s portrayal gives us a very active and somewhat suave Welshman who has romanced Chris and fathered Michael. Is being Welsh a foreign enough attraction for small town Irish girls? But he is footloose in a number ways, popping in and out of the Mundy home with a disdainful irregularity. But each appearance brings new hope to Michael and Chris…a hope that will remain unrequited.

Marcus Truschinski as the narrator, Michael Evans. Photo courtesy of American Players Theatre. Photos by Liz Lauren. 

And our last character is Michael Evans, a seven year old boy in August 1936 when these events take place. But the seven year old does not appear in the play…he is spoken to, looked after, spoken of, and searched for…and obviously loved and cherished by the entire household. But the physical Michael Evans is played by Marcus Truschinski. And this Michael is an urbane and well spoken adult who is the narrator here…and Truschinski slowly materialized on stage from the various wings to give us a succinct and telling narration on the backgrounds, causes, and results of the various events that we witness in Ballybeg. This adult Michael is of indeterminate age in the play, but as presented here, clearly a free agent adult.

One last kudo that I think is very important. I would like to thank Adrianne Moore, the Voice and Text Coach, and Director DeVita for providing for the lilt and melody of the Irish accents here without getting so dense as to obscure the dialogue. Clearly hearing and understanding the text here is very important to understanding the story.

I apologize that my APT season was later than normal this year and that there are only a few dates left to see Dancing At Lughnasa: but Ticket Info and Other Info can be accessed here.

Posted on

The Future Of The Charles Allis and Villa Terrace Museums Move One Step Closer To Gone As Milwaukee County Considers Private Offers For The Properties!

Back in June I wrote about the future of these two fine museums and warned that their futures were in danger. Milwaukee County of course continues to be financially distressed and of course the arts are an easy target. Of course part of the issue (like the Milwaukee Public Museum and the late great Bradley Center) is no one ever wants to spend money on infrastructure repair and maintenance until the numbers are astronomical and then they want to walk away from it. I believe that the Mitchell Park Domes are still in a similar limbo.

But here is my previous article: The Future Of The Charles Allis and Villa Terrace Museums Has Reached A Tipping Point: We May Lose Them Forever. And the remainder of this article will discuss new information about offers from private firms to take over the real estate, but not the museums. And the most recent article from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (aka JSOnline): Villa Terrace, Charles Allis museums could be privately owned. I apologize, this seems to be behind a firewall. I will pull out what I need.

Two small publicly owned museums on Milwaukee’s east side could be converted into private businesses — a boutique hotel and an events venue — under a pair of new proposals.

Those ideas are competing with other plans to maintain the financially challenged Villa Terrace Decorative Arts Museum and Charles Allis Art Museum — while granting ownership of those county-owned museums to private, nonprofit groups.

Milwaukee County has contributed roughly $225,000 to Charles Allis and Villa Terrace operations annually since 2015.

The article talks about a number of options for the current non-profit that currently runs the two museums while the county continues ownership. But then decries that the county is once again in financial straits and can’t afford their $225,000 annual support. Of course that bit could probably be made up in private fundraising and donations, but this last bit probably is a push:

County Executive David Crowley’s administration favors a plan from Friends of Villa Terrace Inc. that would create a starting point for negotiations.

It would keep Villa Terrace, 2200 N. Terrace Drive, as a museum, with the county perhaps transferring ownership to the private, nonprofit group.

The friends group wants the county to provide $3 million over five years to address deferred maintenance at the century-old property.

The group also wants $125,000 over three years “to transition operations.” It would raise $1.5 million in private funds to create a $500,000 operating endowment and help pay for improvements.

The group is willing to discuss the future of the Charles Allis Art Museum, the report said.

If you caught that last line, their current proposal doesn’t include maintaining the Charles Allis Art Museum, the museum in this pair that has the better permanent collection. And the numbers being requested probably don’t fit in the county’s long or short term budget considerations.

And the proposal from the group actually running the two museums?

Meanwhile, Charles Allis and Villa Terrace Museums Inc. submitted a plan to continue the private, nonprofit group’s operation of the museums with county financial support.

That group wants $10 million for building improvements. It also proposes a “gradual stepdown” of the county’s operation funding over seven years.

“Ultimately this proposal received the lowest score due to the unrealistic capital request, the length of continued operational support, lack of fundraising goals, and no clear end to the County’s investment,” the report said. (emphasis mine) It also said the group has since discussed with county officials reducing its funding requests and other matters.

Charles Allis and Villa Terrace Museums Inc., which has operated the museums for 20 years, “has built an infrastructure of operational excellence on a lean budget,” responded Executive Director Jaymee Harvey Willms.

Unfortunately the scions of Milwaukee business that built these homes and then donated them to the public as museums are long gone and the firms that provided their wealth have disappeared as well, so no white knight’s are likely to appear on the horizon from that quarter. And let’s keep in mind that Wisconsin is 46th out of the 50 states in public funding for the arts and rumors persist that we are moving further down the list.

So the headlines talk about the buildings being sold to private business and the museums being shuttered. From my point of view, the worst case scenario but from the county’s point of view probably the most appealing. The one is for Villa Terrace alone and envisions the Bartolotta Restaurant group purchasing it and turning it into an event and restaurant space. And the other would take on both the Charles Allis as a boutique hotel and Villa Terrace as a related event space.

The Bartolotta plan?

Bartolotta Restaurant Group LLC, working with Delafield-based HF Hospitality, would create a plan for redeveloping Villa Terrace as a “high-end hospitality venue” — with Bartolotta buying the property for a price to be determined.

“Beyond any restaurant operations, if any, which would be open to the general public, Villa Terrace would continue to have public access through periodic tours at designated dates and times,” the report said. The building’s art would be returned to the county. (emphasis mine)

And the hotel/event space offer?

Dynamic Events LLC, an events planner, would use Villa Terrace as an events venue and the Allis Museum as a boutique hotel/guesthouse, with the room count to be determined.

The firm would buy the properties for $1 each, with the county also providing a $4 million, 20-year loan at 4% interest. Additional funding to redevelop the sites would come from the developer’s equity, a bank loan and historic preservation tax credits.

Dynamic Events owner David Caruso told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that his plan would “preserve both iconic landmarks in a way that they can benefit from each other — a boutique hotel and a private/public event venue.”

$1 each? How magnanimous. And you can’t come up with $4 million on your own? If this is such a good idea you can finance this privately and pay the county what the properties are worth. If the county can’t see fit to support a public treasure they have no business supporting a private business.

So where are we?? It seems we are still in the early stages of discovery but to me the only answer is finding a way to maintain these two museums as museums. Whether that is continued through improved county support or a new and improved county/non-profit effort or whether we find find new resources for the non-profit currently running it I don’t know. But I can’t accept the loss of more cultural sites in our area.

And there was just a short mention that I included above and highlighted that really needs to be discussed. What happens to the permanent collections of art housed in these two museums if they are closed and sold? Given the county’s lack of will and foresight in preserving public infrastructure, I don’t currently trust them as being proper caretakers of our heritage. But that’s a conversation that I hope we don’t need to have.